Search Results for: archaeology
Does history support the Bible?
Does History Support the Bible: Many maintain the opinion that the Bible is full of historic inaccuracies. However, throughout the centuries, passages in the Bible that were once thought to be myth or historically inaccurate have been later confirmed to be accurate. Below are just some examples of history and archaeology confirming the accuracy of the Bible: The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah: For centuries the scientific community assumed the story of Sodom and Gomorrah was a myth. However, in the late 1980s archaeologists discovered the site of Sodom and Gomorrah which included a mass, simultaneous burial. The…
History Vs. The Bible: Domestication of Camels
… not necessarily require large numbers of camels… The smaller amount of evidence for domestic camels in the late third and early second millennium B.C., especially in Palestine, is in accordance with this more restricted use Randall W. Younker, Director – Institute of Archaeology Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Archaeology - Late Bronze Age Camel Petroglyphs in the Wadi Nasib, Sinai, Near East Archaeological Society Bulletin1997, p. 42, 52 Biblical quote concerning the early domestication of camels: He treated Abram well for her sake, and Abram acquired sheep and cattle, male and female donkeys, menservants and maidservants, and camels. Genesis 12:16-25…
Is the Bible the Word of God?
… David: Many archaeologists once claimed King David was a mythical character. However, in 1933 fragments from a stone monument was found at Tel Dan which identifies King David and the “House of David.” The monument was erected in honor of a battle sited in 1 Kings 15:20 between King Asa and Israel. This battle was also once believed to be a myth. While the historical accuracy of the Bible is still questioned by many today, the number of alleged inaccuracies decreases with the continued advancements in archaeology. In fact, never has an archaeological discovery discredited the Biblical account: “It…
History Vs. The Bible: King David
… him. The quest for the historical David, therefore, is primarily exegetical. P. Kyle McCarier Jr. - The Historical David.hronicle of Higher Education “I am not the only scholar who suspects that the figure of David is about historical as King Arthur.” Philip Davies, professor of Biblical studies at the University of Sheffield - Biblical Archaeology Review, July/August 1994 55 Archaeological quote confirming the existence of King David (2000): Archaeologist and biblical scholars were thrilled to discover that the inscription included a reference to David – or, more precisely, the house of David (bet David),…according to the archaeologists who found it at…